Why A Legend Of The Sword Sequel By no means Occurred

Man Ritchie’s King Arthur: Legend of the Sword had a giant future deliberate, however a sequel by no means really occurred. This is what went improper with it.

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is likely one of the most up-to-date diversifications of the Arthurian legends, and whereas there’s sufficient materials for a couple of film, a sequel to it by no means occurred – and right here’s why. The legends of King Arthur have grow to be among the hottest tales in historical past and as such, they’ve been tailored to all kinds of media for years. Hollywood hasn’t missed the prospect to discover these and has introduced a wide range of variations of the legends. Among the many most up-to-date ones is King Arthur: Legend of the Sword.

Directed by Man Ritchie, and co-written by him, Joby Harold, and Lionel Wigram from a narrative by Harold and David Dobkin, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword adopted the title character (performed by Charlie Hunnam) as he discovered about his royal lineage after pulling the magical sword Excalibur from a stone. With the assistance of Sir Bedivere (Djimon Hounsou), Arthur got down to destroy King Vortigern (Jude Legislation), the tyrannical king who killed his father and was making an attempt to kill him too. King Arthur was launched in 2017, and whereas it was marketed as a giant, epic journey, with Ritchie’s title as assure seal, the film ended up being an epic failure.


Associated: King Arthur: David Beckham’s Weird Cameo Defined

Sadly, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword‘s flop did not simply impression itself. Had the movie been the success it was meant to be, a number of extra movies would have adopted fleshing out a wider, shared universe of Arthurian legend. This is what Warner Bros. initially had deliberate, and why it did not pan out.

How King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword Slayed A Attainable Franchise

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, filmed everywhere in the UK, had a manufacturing finances of $175 million. Nonetheless, it grossed solely $148 million worldwide. The movie didn’t do effectively with critics both, who weren’t on board with the tempo, story, and the way it excised a lot of what makes the story a traditional. These failures are what finally killed all plans for a King Arthur cinematic universe. Whereas King Arthur: Legend of the Sword instructed a full story and may stand by itself, it did make approach for at the least yet one more journey. On the finish of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, the title character began constructing a Spherical Desk the place his knighted pals would meet, and he additionally lastly grew to become king, taking his father Uther’s (Eric Bana) crown. This was meant to arrange extra storylines that the long run King Arthur films would have explored.

What Warner Brothers’ Arthurian Shared Cinematic Universe Would Have Seemed Like

Had King Arthur: Legend of the Sword labored out, Warner Bros. had a King Arthur shared universe plan able to go. Following the important failure of King Arthur in 2004, Warner Bros. was seeking to adapt the Arthurian legend yet one more time, and after a few concepts that have been finally dropped (akin to a film titled Arthur & Lancelot which may have seen Equipment Harington and Joel Kinnaman because the leads), the studio determined to go together with a a lot greater undertaking. The shared universe would have begun with Ritchie’s film earlier than branching into six extra. These movies would have finally introduced in characters who obtained left apart in Legend of the Sword, most notably Lancelot and Guinevere. Nonetheless, the important and industrial failure of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword put an finish to all these plans.

Why King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword Deserves A Rewatch

Regardless of being a field workplace blunder, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword remains to be a strong and pleasing fantasy journey movie that deserves to be seen. The entire components that the film had going for it, such because the beloved supply materials, sturdy ensemble forged, and really excessive manufacturing worth (because of the large finances Warner Bros. allotted) supply a satisfying viewing expertise, even when field workplace numbers on the time of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword‘s launch do not replicate that. One other sturdy case to be made for the movie’s worthiness is its compelling route by Man Ritchie, who has gone on to helm different profitable tasks after his Arthurian flop.

Associated: Each King Arthur Film, Ranked Worst To Greatest

Following the failure of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, Man Ritchie directed Aladdin and The Gents (each obtained rather a lot higher than the Arthurian legend). King Arthur actor Charlie Hunnam additionally appeared in several films, most notably Triple Frontier and The Gents, however he shared in January 2020 (by way of CheatSheet) that he want to return to the universe of King Arthur – although, at this level, it appears unlikely that these shared universe plans might be revived.

Subsequent: How Man Ritchie’s King Arthur Adjustments the Traditional Story

Zac Efron and Ryan Kiera Armstrong in Firestarter 2022

Firestarter Critiques Blast Boring & Disjointed Stephen King Adaptation

About The Creator

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button